实验动物科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 18-22.DOI: 10. 3969 / j. issn. 1006-6179. 2022. 04. 004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

兴奋性在导盲犬早期筛选中的预判效果分析

  

  1. ( 1. 大连医科大学实验动物中心,大连 116044) ( 2. 中国导盲犬大连培训基地,大连 116044)
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-25 出版日期:2022-08-28 发布日期:2022-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 周子娟( 1987—) ,女,硕士学位,实验师. E-mail: zhouzijuan0512@ 163. com 王靖宇( 1964—) ,男,博士学位,教授. E-mail: wangjingyus@ 163. com
  • 作者简介:董建一( 1979—) ,女,实验师,研究方向:动物学. E-mail:beedream@ 126. com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划( 2019YFF0303305)

Analysis on the predictive effect of excitability in early screen of guide dogs

  1. ( 1. Laboratory Animal Center, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China)
    ( 2. China Guide Dog Dalian Training Centre,Dalian 116044, China)
  • Received:2021-10-25 Online:2022-08-28 Published:2022-09-15

摘要: 目的 通过对待训犬气质测试中与兴奋性相关的 PLAY、追逐测试、被动测试、距离测试 4 个项目进行评估,分析兴奋性在导盲犬早期筛选中的预判效果。 方法 以中国导盲犬大连培训基地提供的 92 只拉布拉多犬( 导盲犬 59 只,淘汰犬 33 只)作为研究对像,分别对导盲犬和淘汰犬在气质测试与兴奋性相关的测试项目中的行为表现进行分析,同时对不同性别的犬、同一性别的导盲犬和淘汰犬在行为学测试中的表现进行差异分析。 结果 导盲犬( n = 59)与兴奋性相关的行为学测试的评分显著高于淘汰犬( n = 33) ,结果具有统计学意义( t = 2. 31,P< 0. 05) ,与兴奋性相关的 PLAY、追逐测试、被动测试、距离测试 4 个测试项目中导盲犬被动测试评分显著高于淘汰犬( t =2. 05,P<0. 05) 。 雄性犬( n = 54)和雌性犬( n = 28) 与兴奋性相关的行为学测试的评分无显著差异( t = 0. 03,P >0. 05) ,4 个测试项目中雄性犬在被动测试中的评分显著高于雌性犬( t = 2. 56,P< 0. 05) 。 4 个行为学测试中,雌性导盲犬( n = 24)的距离游戏测试评分显著高于淘汰犬( n = 14) ( t = 2. 20,P<0. 05) ,4 个行为学测试的 9 个变量中导盲犬在走动时间评分( t = 2. 25,P<0. 05) 、探索变量评分( t = 2. 20,P< 0. 05) 较淘汰均显著增多;雄性导盲犬( n =35)和淘汰犬( n = 19)之间分析无显著差异。 结论 与兴奋性相关的 4 个测试项目总体评估对待训犬的筛选具有一定的作用。

关键词: 导盲犬, 兴奋性, 行为特征

Abstract: Objective To analysis on the predictive effect of excitability in early screen of guide dogs, four items related to excitability, PLAY, chase test, passive test and distance test, were evaluated in temperament test of the trained dogs. Method The subjects were 92 Labrador Retrievers dogs from China Guide Dog Training Centre, guide dogs( n = 59) and elimination dogs( n = 33) . By 4 excitability tests ( PLAY, Chase, Passive, Distance) and 9 behavioral variables elated items ( interest, grabbing, tug-of-war, chase average, grabbing average, moving range, moving time, posture change, exploration) were tested in Labrador Retrievers. We were trying to analyze the difference between performances of guide dogs and elimination dogs, between dogs of different sex , between guide dogs and elimination dogs of the same sex. Result Between guide dogs ( n = 59) and eliminated dogs ( n = 33) . According to the results of statistical analysis, The 4 excitability tests average score were significantly difference between guide dogs and eliminated dogs ( t = 2. 31, P < 0. 05 ) . The passive test showed significant difference between guide dogs and eliminated dogs ( t = 2. 05, P<0. 05) . Between male ( n = 54) and female ( n = 28) ,no significant difference was detected for the scores of the 4 excitability tests between male dogs and female dogs ( t = 0. 03,P>0. 05) , the passive test in male dogs was significantly higher than that in eliminated dogs( t = 2. 56, P<0. 05) . While, Between female guide dogs ( n = 24) and eliminated dogs ( n = 14) ,The distance test in female guide dogs was significantly higher than female eliminated dogs ( t = 2. 20, P<0. 05) . In the 9 behavioral variables elated items, moving range test ( t = 2. 25, P<0. 05) , exploration test( t = 2. 20, P<0. 05) in male guide dogs was significantly higher than that in female eliminated dogs. Analysis between male guide dogs ( n = 35) and eliminated dogs ( n = 19) , no significant difference was detected for the scores of the 9 behavioral variables elated items between male guide dogs and male dogs. Conclusion This study indicated that potential that the assessment of excitability is meaningful in early screen of guide dogs.

Key words: guide dogs, excitability, behavioral characteristics

中图分类号: